Clinicopathological definition, management and prognostic value of mogamulizumab-associated rash and other cutaneous events: A systematic review.

Mogamulizumab is a first-in-class IgG1k monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the chemokine receptor type 4. The drug has received Food and Drug administration authorisation for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome following failure of at least one previous course of systemic therapy and now is available in Europe. One of the most common treatment-related side effects observed has been the mogamulizumab-associated rash (MAR), which affects up to a quarter of patients and is the most frequent adverse event leading to drug discontinuation. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the literature on patients diagnosed with MAR and other mogamulizumab-related cutaneous events to describe the clinical and histological characteristics, the management in clinical practice and to assess whether these events have prognostic implications. In total, 2073 records were initially identified through a literature search, 843 of which were duplicates. After screening for eligibility and inclusion criteria, 49 articles reporting mogamulizumab-associated cutaneous events were included. Totally, 1516 patients were retrieved, with a slight male prevalence as for the available data (639 males and 570 females, i.e. 52.9% vs. 47.1%). Regarding the reported clinicopathological findings of the cutaneous reactions, the five most common patterns were spongiotic/psoriasiform dermatitis (22%), eruptions characterized by the presence of papules and/or plaques (16.1%), cutaneous granulomatosis (11.4%), morbilliform or erythrodermic dermatitis (9.4%) and photodermatitis (7.1%). Our results highlight how the majority of the reported cutaneous adverse events on mogamulizumab are of mild-to-moderate entity and generally manageable in clinical practice, though prompt recognition is essential and case-by-case assessment should be recommended. Future research will need to focus on the MAR prognostic implications and to identify genomic and molecular markers for a more rapid and accurate diagnosis.

Topical ruxolitinib: A new treatment for vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder whose diagnosis is often psychologically upsetting. The efficacy of the available therapies, including topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors, has historically been limited and the management of vitiligo is still challenging. As vitiligo is a chronic disease limited to the skin, topical rather than systemic therapies may be preferable (especially among patients with localised lesions) to avoid the long-term side-effects of the latter. A topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, has recently been approved in the United States for the treatment of non-segmental vitiligo in patients aged >12 years based on data from the phase III TRuE-V1 and TRuE-V2 clinical trials. The aim of this review is to describe the current evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of topical ruxolitinib in the treatment of vitiligo, and discuss issues regarding its use in younger children and pregnant or breastfeeding women, as well as the duration and durability of treatment. The promising results obtained so far suggest that 1.5% ruxolitinib cream is an effective means of treating vitiligo.

Clinical and serological predictors of relapse in pemphigus: a study of 143 patients.

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is an autoimmune bullous disease mediated by autoantibodies targeting epithelial cell-cell adhesion molecules. Predictors of relapse have not yet been clearly identified. AIMS: To identify factors at diagnosis and during follow-up that could be predictors of relapse. METHODS: Clinical and immunopathological data at diagnosis, clinical remission and first relapse from patients with pemphigus vulgaris or foliaceus and at least a 36-month follow-up were collected retrospectively. Based on the autoantibody profile at diagnosis, three serological patient subsets were devised: (i) anti-desmoglein (Dsg)1-positive and anti-Dsg3-negative; (iii) anti-Dsg1-negative and anti-Dsg3-positive; and (iii) anti-Dsg1-positive and anti-Dsg3-positive. RESULTS: Data from 143 patients were collected. No significant differences were found between relapsers (n = 90) and nonrelapsers (n = 53) for time to remission or for anti-Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 titres at diagnosis and remission. In the analysis of all patients, a higher risk of relapse was found for a body surface area (BSA) score of 3 compared with BSA < 3 (OR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.17-9.28; P = 0.02) and for a positive titre of either anti-Dsg1 or anti-Dsg3 autoantibodies at remission compared with both being negative (OR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.21-4.85, P = 0.01). In patients who were anti-Dsg3-positive and anti-Dsg1-negative at diagnosis, failure to achieve anti-Dsg3 negativity at clinical remission was a significant predictor of relapse (OR = 7.89, 95% CI 2.06-30.21; P < 0.01). Similarly, failure to achieve anti-Dsg1 negativity at clinical remission was a significant predictor of relapse in patients with both anti-Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 positivity at diagnosis (OR = 5.74, 95% CI 1.15-28.61; P = 0.03), but not in those who were anti-Dsg1-positive/anti-Dsg3-negative at diagnosis (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.27-4.30; P = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Regardless of pemphigus subtype, autoantibody titre negativity at clinical remission in patients classified based on their anti-Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 profile at diagnosis and BSA were useful tools in predicting relapse.